User System

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '18 at 16:23
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 139 2-Core 256 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 754 74% 606 Pts	64-Core 728 45% 728 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38.3 37% 38.5 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.8 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 338 325 319 299 290 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 488 Mixed 391 SusWrite 339 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 66.3 228% 81.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 458GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 130 125 138 137 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 5.5 Write 98.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 134 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 107%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 721GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 82 81 78 81 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 92.2 Write 84.3 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 79.9 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 74%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 16GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 28 Mixed 27 SusWrite 28.8 40% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 34% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 2x8GB 2,080 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 26.5 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 26.7 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16