Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455
, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 165
48% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 387
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 46
Parallax 107
36% 65.5 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 169
Splatting 47.7
67% 84.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2134 691 604 610 608 608 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 2,139
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 876
384% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 76
278% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 675
501% 664 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 261%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 199 191 200 201 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 144
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 198
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.6 3.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 3
8% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
226% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback