Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 550P5C/550P7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140617
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '18 at 07:31
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 171 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 433 48% 378 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.65% Terrible	Lighting 8.93 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 9.31 7% 8.77 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 11.4 8% 10 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.65% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,188 Write 2712 Mixed 3,330 756% 3,410 MB/s	4K Read 260 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 208 733% 201 MB/s	DQ Read 615 DQ Write 439 DQ Mixed 521 391% 525 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 22.2 Write 12.3 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 13.7 20% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.6 142% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S8G64CB8HB5N-CG 1x8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	313x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	151x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	106x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	477x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	85x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	144x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	70x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16