Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 17:18
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 142
56% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 340
37% 293 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 68.3
57% 69 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 58
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 128 128 122 125 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 392
Write 203
Mixed 242
SusWrite 134
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 36.5
126% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 182
133% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
310GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 84.3
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 85%
BUFFALO External HDD 1.5TB
835GB free, PID 019b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 20
Mixed 30
SusWrite 32.7
39% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback