Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 209
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 43.7
34% 39.4 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 37.7
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DENCSTE351M11-0240 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 106 102 97 96 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
Read 160
Write 117
Mixed 149
SusWrite 97.7
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 32.1
118% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 118
91% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
85GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 23 23 18 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 23.6
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 20.6
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.6
190% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 41%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Read 29.9
Write 17.2
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 18
22% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $166
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback