PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171019 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '18 at 12:09 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 110 111 116 116 MB/s
|
68%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
914GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 126 126 126 126 MB/s
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 126GB
24GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 11 11 11 10 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,513x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 833x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 573x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 401x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 346x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 339x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $844 |