| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 18 '18 at 07:47 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.1%
Good
|
54% 87.1 Pts
|
37% 299 Pts
|
8% 132 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2730) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
10% 21.6 fps
|
20% 24.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
18GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 75 77 81 86 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
33% 148 MB/s
|
73% 23.8 MB/s
|
30% 43.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
175GB free
Firmware: LC15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 59 60 59 62 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
55% 75 MB/s
|
138% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 44 73 77 80 85 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
49% 66.8 MB/s
|
153% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.9%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
12% 4.2 GB/s
|
47% 84.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,855 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 506x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |