| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5N-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090518 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 15 '18 at 20:47 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51%
Above average
|
43% 65.7 Pts
|
21% 160 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
|
59.1%
Above average
|
59% 69.4 fps
|
59% 71.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
727GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 101 105 104 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
65% 88.6 MB/s
|
165% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
916GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 100 101 102 101 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
70% 95.4 MB/s
|
174% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 2TB
270GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
|
10%
Terrible
|
22% 17.1 MB/s
|
60% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.5%
Very poor
|
13% 4.5 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
44% 90.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $494 |