Asus P7P55D EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D EVO (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090728
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '18 at 05:45
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 51.6 2-Core 102 53% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 308 31% 252 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 71 70 71 71 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 198 Write 199 Mixed 168 SusWrite 69.1 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 26 86% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 35 32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 226GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 93 95 95 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 185 Write 204 Mixed 182 SusWrite 93.6 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 27.8 89% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 39.9 31% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 134%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 97GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 50 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 50 Write 47.8 Mixed 42 SusWrite 50.7 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 35%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 684GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 93 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 87.8 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 93.6 62% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 70 66 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 92 Write 91.8 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 68 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 85%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 40GB free, PID 00b2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 20 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 14.6 25% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.9 198% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 34%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 29.2 Write 4.3 Mixed 7 SusWrite 2.6 10% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 7%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 154GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 34 Write 28.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 16.5 34% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 42%
WD My Book 1230 2TB 4,878 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 898GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 33 Write 24.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 27.3 36% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D EVO Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	40x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	28x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	46x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16