Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160921
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 172 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 322 39% 301 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 34.5 30% 32.8 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 31.3 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 316 306 314 311 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 312 Write 322 Mixed 277 SusWrite 308 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 26.3 94% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 312 236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 692GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 192 196 194 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 78.2 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 192 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB 7,794 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 17 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	147x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	130x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	55x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	79x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	32x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,735 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16