Asus X99-E

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161005
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 747 78% 624 Pts	64-Core 900 56% 900 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% EVGA(3842 2717) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 4.03 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.57 Splatting 5.74 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 123321258 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 -121006408585331 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 121 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 22 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 46 77312426023 (C2) HDA temperature 39 46 77312426023 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 123321258 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 123321258 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 123321258 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12832 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4644 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4644 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7515 (F4) Unknown 99 99 5046302	61.3% Good	Read 510 Write 177 Mixed 262 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 8.84 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 15.4 80% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 50.7 65% 114 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 569GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 119 110 7050 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12961 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 43180 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 365 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 116 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 336887 (C2) HDA temperature 110 102 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.6% Above average	Read 97.7 Write 96.2 Mixed 94 72% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 59GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 131 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11844 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 12 12 64516 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 912 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 290 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11844 (C2) HDA temperature 102 91 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 41 41 43142 (F1) Unknown 200 200 12941614757 (F2) Unknown 200 200 186653764730	33.4% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 62.3 Mixed 57.3 44% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB 11,542 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 45.5 MC Mixed 35.3 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	270x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	88x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	22x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $603

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16