LG R590-K.BE56P1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG R590-K.BE56P1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '18 at 15:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 30.4
1-Core 24
2-Core 42.4
20% 32.3 Pts
4-Core 53.1
8-Core 61.1
8% 57.1 Pts
64-Core 60.8
4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Device(1854 0821) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.09 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 75.4
Mixed 73.6
53% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.3
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 252
16% 252 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback