Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 89.2 49% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 153 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 000F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Lighting 5.23 Reflection 7.96 Parallax 4.78 4% 5.99 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 11 6% 7.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,381 Write 925 Mixed 1,051 248% 1,119 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 33.6 160% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 63.8 68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x2GB 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	18x
Iris Graphics 540IntelBench 7%, 6,448 samples	13x
Iris 540 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 8%, 4,591 samples	5x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLV256 256GBNvmeBench 122%, 8,369 samples	20x
MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 127%, 2,256 samples	3x
SAMSUNG MZVLV512 512GBNvmeBench 137%, 2,994 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16