Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '18 at 17:57
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 83 2-Core 133 61% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 203 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.88 Parallax 3.06 3% 4.02 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.78 4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 87 87 138 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 60	53.2% Above average	Read 263 Write 244 Mixed 208 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 7.86 70% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 12.8 55% 122 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 94%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 282GB free Firmware: JE3OA50A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 327680 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 187 187 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 6288 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 8180 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3839 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 131072 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 241429 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 266288168997 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 38 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	42.8% Average	Read 75.9 Write 73.3 Mixed 24 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.15 53% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.9 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	151x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	500x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16