Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '18 at 22:13
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 88.6 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 97 51% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 249 26% 208 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 079F) 1.2GB CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 21.1 16% 23.3 fps	MRender 32 Gravity 15 Splatting 21.1 18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 246 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 284 (A5) Unknown 100 100 161 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 100 100 203 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 154 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 49 210453397545 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 197572427822 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 295 (EA) Unknown 100 100 897 (F1) Unknown 100 100 371 (F2) Unknown 100 100 447 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	30.1% Below average	Read 377 Write 91.8 Mixed 60 38% 176 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 6.47 4K Mixed 3.67 31% 8.41 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 3.56 6% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 186GB free Firmware: 3.02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 53 167726520 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8484 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 723683894 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11664 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8468 (C2) HDA temperature 27 52 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 51 167726520 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	34.5% Below average	Read 59.6 Write 60.4 Mixed 27.2 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.38 93% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.9% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 10 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16