Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9600 323 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 69 1-Core 25 2-Core 43.7 34% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 44.6 8-Core 44.2 6% 44.4 Pts	64-Core 43.6 3% 43.6 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0252) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.29 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14911 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2844 (B1) Unknown 88 88 415 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 1 1848 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23358638513	40.9% Average	Read 258 Write 191 Mixed 229 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 11.7 54% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 61.5 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 10.4 22% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16