| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150324 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 05 '18 at 08:25 |
| Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.6%
Very good
|
73% 125 Pts
|
50% 400 Pts
|
29% 470 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.26%
Terrible
|
1% 1.43 fps
|
2% 1.81 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
92% 416 MB/s
|
114% 36.2 MB/s
|
92% 155 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
25% 21.3 MB/s
|
49% 0.62 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
922GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
20.7%
Poor
|
22% 19.4 MB/s
|
152% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.4%
Poor
|
25% 8.63 GB/s
|
26% 9.27 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,668x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |