Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '18 at 20:20
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 741 75% 608 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 38.8 38% 38.8 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 37 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 87GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5579 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 665 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 79 (C2) HDA temperature 67 56 188979347489	57.6% Above average	Read 498 Write 279 Mixed 278 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 7.47 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 33.1 30% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 93%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 2,059 Write 1,228 Mixed 1,196 330% 1,494 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 19.7 124% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40.9 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 26 33% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 236%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 575GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 126 126 21494497580 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3964 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 507 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3964 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3964 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 176094511139 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.2% Very good	Read 140 Write 125 Mixed 138 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.2 102% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 179GB free Firmware: 1AA01107 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 68 68 10230 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 9740 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 31098 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 42 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5585 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 138 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 487522333 (C2) HDA temperature 67 57 9144565793 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 13300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 187 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0	49.3% Average	Read 78.4 Write 92.8 Mixed 84.7 64% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.53 139% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 60%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 57GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 150 Write 68.9 Mixed 88.2 117% 102 MB/s	4K Read 6.22 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.74 74% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 7,485 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2197 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.8% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 26.7 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24.3 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	114x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16