Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 10:53
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 100
50% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 301
29% 241 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 83.2
51% 71 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56
51% 63 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 196
Write 109
Mixed 136
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 2.65
35% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.43
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 5.85
9% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 90%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 95.7
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.25
103% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
521GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 68.6
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.28
121% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback