| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 9.39% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 15 '18 at 09:11 |
| Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.1%
Very good
|
67% 110 Pts
|
46% 379 Pts
|
30% 479 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.2
|
56.3%
Above average
|
56% 73.4 fps
|
57% 68.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9.39%
Terrible
|
19% 89 MB/s
|
0% 0.03 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
|
|
33.9%
Below average
|
45% 59.5 MB/s
|
79% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
53.9%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
69% 57.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |