Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '18 at 14:31
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 413
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 69.2
63% 75.2 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 73.3
60% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
222GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
80.4% Excellent
Read 269
Write 214
Mixed 219
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 44
156% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 104
99% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 124%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 496
Write 185
Mixed 270
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 6.47
98% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 7.38
38% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 72%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
71GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
48GB free
Firmware: 080.
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 50.1
Mixed 19.8
32% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.12
63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
35GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 96.7
Write 62.4
Mixed 73.6
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.31
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
11GB free
Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 107
Write 95.3
Mixed 76.5
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.34
88% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
8GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 97.3
Mixed 74
65% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.32
75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3 Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback