| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '18 at 01:04 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59%
Above average
|
56% 92.7 Pts
|
39% 327 Pts
|
26% 418 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1584) 3GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1
|
24.1%
Poor
|
23% 34.2 fps
|
26% 32.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
74% 334 MB/s
|
94% 31 MB/s
|
17% 31.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
28.6%
Poor
|
28% 9.73 GB/s
|
20% 6.9 GB/s
|
45% 88.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 40x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $370 |