Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000  (all builds)
MotherboardAOpen D1007
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '14 at 22:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5 M 560-$80
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
37.1% Below average
SC Int 60.3
SC Float 65
SC Mixed 62.6
50% 62.6 Pts
QC Int 156
QC Float 192
QC Mixed 174
39% 174 Pts
MC Int 157
MC Float 193
MC Mixed 175
26% 175 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Device(A0A0 0705) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.1
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.1
1% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$46
427GB free
Firmware: 0002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 82.2
Write 82.2
Mixed 75.9
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.45
98% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
Lexar JumpDrive P10 USB 3.0 32GB-$71
2GB free, PID a836
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 27.2
34% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.51
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.39
53% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 91%
Take a copy of your results
Typical ESPRIMO Q9000 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 15%

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $185
The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $133Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $53Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback