| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-E WS (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170808 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 01 '18 at 10:54 |
| Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
|
77%
Very good
|
72% 126 Pts
|
70% 582 Pts
|
60% 977 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
80.8%
Excellent
|
82% 102 fps
|
79% 96.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
139%
Outstanding
|
237% 1,109 MB/s
|
81% 18.3 MB/s
| |
|
|
56.2%
Above average
|
67% 89.7 MB/s
|
74% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
|
61.8%
Good
|
54% 75.3 MB/s
|
84% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
|
62.4%
Good
|
70% 94.7 MB/s
|
100% 1.09 MB/s
| |
|
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
91% 124 MB/s
|
102% 1.14 MB/s
| |
|
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
115% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
66.1%
Good
|
72% 25 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
46% 86.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 42x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 35x |
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 15x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $1,158 |