PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds) |
Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWAA |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110517 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Feb 22 '18 at 17:22 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
35.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2189
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
256GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 120x |
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 75x |
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 73x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 174x |
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 168x |
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples | 71x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |