Asus F2A55-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M LE (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '18 at 03:58
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 122 53% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 204 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	24% Poor	Lighting 28.4 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 36.3 23% 31.4 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 27.7 Splatting 34.4 26% 30.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10183 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2230 (B1) Unknown 95 95 180 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 405 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13042653984	40.7% Average	Read 250 Write 143 Mixed 163 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 11.3 60% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 37.1 43% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 141GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 68 68 10380 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 506 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10447 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 51432 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 459 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 56 336658452 (C2) HDA temperature 74 55 437256218 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2487 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	36.5% Below average	Read 61.1 Write 65.7 Mixed 73.1 50% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.45 103% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 118GB free Firmware: 12.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 163 6650 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2894 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 31238 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2568 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 743 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2898 (C2) HDA temperature 115 97 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.9% Below average	Read 63.4 Write 47.5 Mixed 72.5 46% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.28 88% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 667, 667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M LE Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LE

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	4x
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x
SSDNow KC300 120GBKingston $80Bench 71%, 2,344 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	17x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $340

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16