| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDS (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '18 at 19:33 |
| Run Duration | 278 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
80% 138 Pts
|
29% 215 Pts
|
13% 216 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
|
16%
Very poor
|
16% 18 fps
|
15% 18.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
65.8%
Good
|
86% 114 MB/s
|
90% 0.79 MB/s
| |
|
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 8005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7.3%
Terrible
|
11% 10.4 MB/s
|
57% 1.59 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
42.4%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
64% 62.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 588 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 123x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 101x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $200 |