MSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7970
MotherboardMSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 22:07
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 255
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 736
70% 581 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 66.8
55% 67.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 53.3
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 1,094
Mixed 1,142
303% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 18.6
98% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 17
33% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 175%
Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
25GB free
Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 171
Write 89.7
Mixed 98.6
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 11.7
59% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 27.4
38% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 85
Mixed 91.5
73% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.15
68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
383GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 151
Write 132
Mixed 120
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.28
94% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81%
Great: 112%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
152GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 65.4
Write 76.2
Mixed 69.8
53% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.26
65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 54%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 512GB-$233
469GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 249
Write 185
Mixed 174
247% 203 MB/s
4K Read 3.29
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.62
59% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL14-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970) Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170A-G43 PLUS (MS-7970)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $482
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback