HP H5Q09AA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP H5Q09AA (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131205
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 04:24
Run Duration	704 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 74 2-Core 137 61% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 266 31% 243 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6258) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 24.1 Parallax 32.5 32% 31.9 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 31.7 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 734GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 62128976 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3088 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 129362124628 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21346 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2908 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1167634667 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 258286616610 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4184 (C2) HDA temperature 34 50 -140737488355294 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 16 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	92.6% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 171 Mixed 160 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.28 84% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 370GB free Firmware: GR2OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 100 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2304 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3743 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 361 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 320667676 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3932220 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 11548 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	41.9% Average	Read 70.3 Write 75.6 Mixed 75.4 56% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 58%
WD My Passport Essential 250GB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 113GB free, PID 070a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 19.1 Mixed 17.5 25% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.27 40% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,795 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 91GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 165 Write 74.5 Mixed 100 130% 113 MB/s	4K Read 7.22 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.47 112% 3.24 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 23GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 6.58 Mixed 11.9 16% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.52 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.32 105% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 15GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Read 27.9 Write 5.13 Mixed 11.2 15% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.78 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.83 82% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer U 16GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 55a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	6.95% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 4.44 Mixed 5.78 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.14 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.69 60% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.95% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 12GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP H5Q09AA

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)