Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140514
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 10:35
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 87 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 589 54% 456 Pts	64-Core 744 46% 744 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Asus(1043 8495) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 60.7 Parallax 78.6 50% 67.1 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 68.1 Splatting 46.4 50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11985 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 88 (B1) Unknown 98 98 41 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 53 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24658541451	91.7% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 402 Mixed 414 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 35.1 124% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 86.6 96% 164 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 124%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 537GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 400GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 151 Write 104 Mixed 145 101% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.33 97% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010) 6,983 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 389GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 9 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7833 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1406 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 29 29 52352 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1034 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 594 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 811 (C2) HDA temperature 107 87 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3	77.5% Very good	Read 154 Write 116 Mixed 124 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.39 131% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 85%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 14GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 137 11516 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8072 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18840 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (10) Unknown 5 195 99441910818 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8000 (C2) HDA temperature 109 98 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.6% Good	Read 120 Write 122 Mixed 117 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.21 93% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 37.6 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	528x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	272x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	181x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	122x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	116x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	112x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	49x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	22x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 3,160 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16