Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '18 at 18:38
Run Duration	508 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 283 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 754 75% 609 Pts	64-Core 781 48% 781 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 178 Parallax 174 138% 174 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 177 Splatting 118 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 103GB free Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1749 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1583 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 274 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 58 180389543961 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5174297452 (F7) Unknown 100 100 162710938 (F8) Unknown 100 100 75162769 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1945 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	86.2% Excellent	Read 483 Write 312 Mixed 326 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 26.9 119% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 47.4 96% 198 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 99%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 1,960 Write 1,020 Mixed 1,164 304% 1,381 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 67.6 250% 87.7 MB/s	DQ Read 849 DQ Write 565 DQ Mixed 243 306% 552 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 226457632 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1068 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 29212854 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1864 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1060 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 78 54 370212886 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 98 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2181 (C2) HDA temperature 22 46 68719476758 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 19318762899227 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15979032668 (F2) Unknown 100 253 29766325745	99.3% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 160 Mixed 170 130% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 149 Write 44.9 Mixed 71.2 95% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.26 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 1.42 151% 3.64 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 38%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 28GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 143 Write 45.3 Mixed 67.7 92% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.88 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 1.38 152% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 9.58 Mixed 14.5 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.25 4K Write 2.76 4K Mixed 0.18 120% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 128 Write 40.8 Mixed 51.9 78% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.83 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.95 102% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 31%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 937 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 6.86 Mixed 6.2 10% 8.79 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.32 37% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 32 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 30.9 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 38.7 SC Mixed 23.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	997x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16