bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.88% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	SAPPHIRE PURE BLACK X58
Memory	6.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration	381 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 22 1-Core 19 2-Core 37.8 16% 26.3 Pts	4-Core 79.8 8-Core 172 15% 126 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.3% Very poor	Lighting 12.5 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 29.9 10% 19.1 fps	MRender 41 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 43 37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 156GB free Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9101 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 95 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 65 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3175448375	16.7% Very poor	Read 268 Write 52.8 Mixed 109 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 3.66 4K Write 2.81 4K Mixed 1.78 9% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 124%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25238 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1565 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 87 87 408 (AE) Unknown 100 100 271 (B5) Unknown 100 100 46922727497259 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 130 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 322 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 87 87 13 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	9.88% Terrible	Read 158 Write 19.2 Mixed 90 19% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.99 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 1.94 8% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 74%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 709GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 172 8050 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 665 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15518 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 350 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 41870 (C2) HDA temperature 126 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.8% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 43.2 Mixed 46.9 38% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.22 77% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 705GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 164 6616 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3317 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 28186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1271 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 341324 (C2) HDA temperature 127 101 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	31.8% Below average	Read 67.2 Write 43.4 Mixed 20.1 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.17 67% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 127GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 166 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3222 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 28169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1271 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 156 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 45843 (C2) HDA temperature 127 94 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	29.5% Poor	Read 82.3 Write 20.8 Mixed 24.3 31% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.15 33% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 3x2GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 306 13% 306 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,019x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,563x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	930x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,038x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16