HP 620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 620 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1526
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 12:24
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6670 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 58.5 36% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 61.7 8-Core 56 8% 58.8 Pts	64-Core 61.9 4% 61.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB3OCA1G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 157 100 90194313218 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1041 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1849 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1023 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 196608 (BC) Unknown 100 99 24 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 504823838 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 28 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2359332 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 10770 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	35.7% Below average	Read 62.4 Write 62.2 Mixed 14.6 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.07 14% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 0GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Read 25.1 Write 8.33 Mixed 10.8 16% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.81 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.63 71% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 0.1 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 620 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 620

CPU
Celeron Dual-Core T3000IntelBench 34%, 1,043 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family v2MobileBench 0%, 39 samples	1x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GBBench 66%, 1,084 samples	1x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16