Asus M2A-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M2A-VM  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071219
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '16 at 00:19
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 59.1
32% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 71.3
8-Core 73.2
10% 72.2 Pts
64-Core 73
4% 73 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.4 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.3
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD75 00AARS-00Y5B 750GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 93.3
Mixed 22.6
51% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.14
60% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
58GB free
Firmware: 03.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 86.7
Write 82.6
Mixed 25.2
47% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.29
97% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
634GB free, PID 0101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.4
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
216GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 26.1
Mixed 24.2
33% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.34
42% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-VM Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback