Acer Aspire XC-230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-230  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-230
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 19:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18
2-Core 19.1
9% 18.5 Pts
4-Core 34.1
8-Core 30.1
4% 32.1 Pts
64-Core 27.8
2% 27.8 Pts
Poor: 10% Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 0800) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.75
1% 1.84 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 163
Write 149
Mixed 146
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.2
92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBGR/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.3
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 600
7% 600 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-230 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $40
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback