Sony SVL24148CXB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony SVL24148CXB (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130313
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '17 at 00:25
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 83.8 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 136 57% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 198 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 9097) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.03 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.75 3% 4.06 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 183 1600 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5197 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7490 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4941 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 24 165 (BC) Unknown 100 21 8590069629 (BE) vendor-specific 59 37 533265317929 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 3431 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 377 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 798869 (C2) HDA temperature 106 84 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	30.2% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 45.4 Mixed 52.6 40% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.24 63% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 43%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 32GB-$15 655 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 17GB free, PID a205 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.56% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 23.2 Mixed 12.3 26% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 2% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.56% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony SVL24148CXB

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)