Hp-pavilion NF574AA-ABZ a6734it

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NF574AA-ABZ a6734it (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON VIOLET
Memory	0.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081105
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 16:45
Run Duration	548 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 49.3 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 44.9 23% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 54.4 8-Core 62.2 8% 58.3 Pts	64-Core 61 4% 61 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 3.94 4% 4.18 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.48 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.5% Poor	Read 238 Write 33 Mixed 81.4 25% 117 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 1.5 31% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 6.92 13% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 78%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 925GB free Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 105 Write 131 Mixed 112 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.37 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%
Seagate ST332081 3AS 320GB 420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 82GB free Firmware: HP21 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 85 Write 82.4 Mixed 85.2 64% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 65%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 10GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 6.63 Mixed 7.13 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.18 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 1% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 33%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB 1,169 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 9GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 4.41 Mixed 6.48 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 16% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.67% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.2 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NF574AA-ABZ a6734it Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NF574AA-ABZ a6734it

CPU
Phenom 9650AMD $125Bench 43%, 2,698 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
7GBUnknownBench 24%, 8,824 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16