Asrock P43ME

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock P43ME (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090515
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 15:40
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 80.2 42% 63.8 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 149 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.45 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128M7VC 128GB 647 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 334 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 5161 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 544 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 483 (F1) Unknown 100 100 599 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1095	32.6% Below average	Read 207 Write 84 Mixed 80.7 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 9.85 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 14.5 16% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 95%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 34GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 11917334 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 -106386339907217 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2022 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 171 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11917334 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11917334 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11917334 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13156 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9923 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9923 (F2) Unknown 0 0 22886	31.9% Below average	Read 110 Write 75.6 Mixed 85.4 20% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 9.82 71% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 87.2 DQ Mixed 8.95 20% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 824GB free Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 98204055 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 959 (05) Reallocated sector count 86 86 590 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 22100308 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44753 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1627 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 12 1709434798689 (BD) vendor-specific 84 84 16 (BE) vendor-specific 69 43 9145548831 (C2) HDA temperature 31 57 25769803807 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 11 98204055 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -8336531493979 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3711025819 (F2) Unknown 100 253 43478281	67.6% Good	Read 122 Write 114 Mixed 87.6 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.42 105% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P43ME Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P43ME

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	2x
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
R7 265AMD $105Bench 20%, 8,934 samples	1x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x

SSD
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16