Asus M3N78 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M3N78 PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091204
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 19:12
Run Duration	315 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom X3 8650 1,447 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 67.6 36% 55 Pts	4-Core 98.7 8-Core 101 13% 99.9 Pts	64-Core 98 6% 98 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1162) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.83 1% 1.02 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74 4,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 138 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 284 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 45 (A3) Unknown 100 100 1 (A4) Unknown 100 100 24563 (A5) Unknown 100 100 56 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 48884 (F2) Unknown 100 100 68737 (F5) Unknown 100 100 98252	47.5% Average	Read 261 Write 150 Mixed 191 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 21.9 76% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 43.6 47% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 83%
SQF-SMSM4-32G-S8E 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 28GB free Firmware: S8FM06A7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 120 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (AA) Unknown 100 100 53 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (DA) Unknown 100 100 1	18.4% Very poor	Read 132 Write 19.2 Mixed 71.1 16% 74 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 5.09 38% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 8.58 10% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 690GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 65 65 11120 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 2963 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 97 97 58 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9992 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 251 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2858 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 103 (B8) Unknown 1 1 1120 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 87 55 218955789 (C2) HDA temperature 84 54 269287440 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 59726 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 98 1223 (C8) Write error rate 99 99 152 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	32.1% Below average	Read 51.3 Write 60.2 Mixed 68.2 46% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.25 79% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 60%
Maxtor S TM3250820A 250GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 232GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 77.8 Write 67.3 Mixed 24.5 41% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.39 93% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.9 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N78 PRO Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N78 PRO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	4x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4550ATIBench 1%, 3,005 samples	2x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	1x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 960GBCrucial $54Bench 69%, 11,103 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
HFS128G32MNB-2202A 128GBBench 71%, 151 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16