Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '17 at 11:55
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 163 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 378 39% 316 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4650 1,681 User benchmarks, average bench 3% XFX(1682 2452) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.920.0.0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 2.72 2% 2.25 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 3 Splatting 1.43 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 85 85 38900913 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 138263587213568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1436 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 75 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 38900913 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 38900913 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 38900913 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25647 (EA) Unknown 0 0 32220 (F1) Unknown 0 0 32220 (F2) Unknown 0 0 37281	33.4% Below average	Read 142 Write 123 Mixed 114 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 8.83 64% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 7.42 16% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 694GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 196 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 67 64 10293 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4787 (05) Reallocated sector count 84 84 2088 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16550 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1758 (B5) Unknown 99 99 22867947 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 209 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 56 188979347482 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 84 84 2088 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 8859 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 2 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4791	61% Good	Read 94 Write 118 Mixed 99.8 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.34 106% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 274GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 133 133 25787302191 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5603 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20507 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1452 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5891 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5891 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 206159413279 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.1% Very good	Read 122 Write 143 Mixed 37 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.16 87% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	397x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	251x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	373x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16