Packard EasyNote TK85

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TK85  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TK85
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '17 at 11:48
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 48
22% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 47.5
8-Core 48.4
6% 48 Pts
64-Core 48
3% 48 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 0487) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.741.0.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 256
Write 65.4
Mixed 107
31% 143 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 9.35
4K Mixed 9.58
36% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 56.4
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 15.6
18% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TK85 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TK85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback