Sony VGN-BX41VN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony VGN-BX41VN  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '17 at 23:02
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 44.1
31% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 44.5
8-Core 45
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 45.6
3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Sony(104D 900F) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543216L9SA00 160GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB2OC40C Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 51.8
Mixed 31.7
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.18
51% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback