PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
Memory | 22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160722 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '17 at 11:14 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
93.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
161%
Outstanding
|
|||
64.9%
Good
|
||||
38.4%
Below average
|
||||
29.2%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 139% - Outstanding | Total price: $76 |