Asus P8H67

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110812
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '17 at 19:58
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 90 2-Core 168 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 333 46% 340 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8504) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.4% Good	Lighting 76.5 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 76.9 62% 77.6 fps	MRender 76.9 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 63.1 57% 70 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10329 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 927 (B1) Unknown 97 97 50 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 47 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18966951817	97.9% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 409 Mixed 418 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 39.9 140% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 90.5 98% 167 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 387GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 134 6158 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3841 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33949 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2859 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 255 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 744814 (C2) HDA temperature 105 95 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.3% Good	Read 110 Write 99.9 Mixed 94.5 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.22 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815SV 160GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 86GB free Firmware: 3.ACF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 20150184 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3242 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 995889737 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 50398 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3193 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 50 823656491 (C2) HDA temperature 43 50 64424509483 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 87 67 180561244 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.4% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 60.4 Mixed 42.2 38% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.29 70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-174.A00LF 9905403-174.A00LF Corsair CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.4% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	165x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	115x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $434

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16