Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 07 '17 at 18:44
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 411
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 68.7
58% 69.7 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 68.3
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 494
Write 392
Mixed 413
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 19
98% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 16
24% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
3GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 83.6
Mixed 86.9
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.31
107% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 109%
ASMT 2115 240GB
211GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 39
Write 38.2
Mixed 39
50% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 7.12
715% 9.65 MB/s
DQ Read 9.13
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 7
736% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 188%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
41GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 8.64
Mixed 11.9
19% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.67
63% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992069 (997069) 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback