Toshiba Satellite A660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.68%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite A660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '17 at 19:16
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.68% Terrible
SC Int 16.5
SC Float 22.9
SC Mixed 22.2
16% 20.5 Pts
QC Int 30.1
QC Float 41.5
QC Mixed 34.8
8% 35.5 Pts
MC Int 43.7
MC Float 54.6
MC Mixed 48.3
7% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Toshiba(1179 FD30) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.7
1% 4.17 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.6
2% 4.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$96
46GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
36.5% Below average
Read 252
Write 204
Mixed 216
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11
42% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 11.1
12% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 116%
Toshiba MK5065GSX 500GB-$45
256GB free
Firmware: GJ003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 63
Write 69.2
Mixed 67.9
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$15
21GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 12.8
Mixed 17.3
23% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.21
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 1.14
98% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT4G3S1067M.C16FKR 859B CT4G3S1067M.M16FKD 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 297
14% 297 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite A660 Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Toshiba Satellite A660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback