ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	XFX XFX nForce 790i Ultra 3-Way SLI
Memory	6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '17 at 19:39
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 85.5 36% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 164 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1010 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 14.4 13% 14.6 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 16.9 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20246 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1182 (B1) Unknown 95 95 170 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 87 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29288624254	39.7% Below average	Read 132 Write 123 Mixed 129 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 18.7 77% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 80.6 DQ Write 79.7 DQ Mixed 44.5 43% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 116%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	3.92% Terrible	Read 14.6 Write 3.43 Mixed 4.84 8% 7.63 MB/s	4K Read 4.39 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.006 17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.92% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback