Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 12:49
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 101
48% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 198
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 2553) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 33.8
23% 30.7 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 36
24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3748 480GB
273GB free
Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 205
Write 130
Mixed 73.1
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 10
54% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 10.9
16% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 50%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 71
Write 34.9
Mixed 47.5
11% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.83
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 2.34
31% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 7.51
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 2.62
9% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
69GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 98
Write 92.4
Mixed 79.2
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.44
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 70%
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB
24GB free
Firmware: GH01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 60.7
Write 9.21
Mixed 16
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.17
40% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1600D364L11S/4G0 1600 CL10 Series00 12GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback