ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 3115m

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP 3115m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3387
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120529
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '17 at 10:32
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 39.7 1-Core 10.1 2-Core 38.9 20% 29.6 Pts	4-Core 39.3 8-Core 39.6 5% 39.4 Pts	64-Core 39.2 2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3387) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.52 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH128GCST 128GB 1,729 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTLA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3778 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 907 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 113 (C2) HDA temperature 63 53 201864445989 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	30.2% Below average	Read 407 Write 94.5 Mixed 177 49% 226 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 9.31 4K Mixed 4.9 18% 6.14 MB/s	DQ Read 63.2 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 17.4 25% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 100%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 36GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 18 Write 15.8 Mixed 14.8 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.39 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.14 99% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GB 2,506 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback