HP G5320gr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP G5320gr (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110318
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 15:48
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 139 58% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 204 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2A9C) 764MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2119 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.35 1% 1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: JPFO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 95 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 100 110 (03) Spinup time 117 100 12897681604 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1537 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 144 100 28 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1537 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 99 99 131071 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 87 84283055 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 50 455999533 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1539 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1539 (C2) HDA temperature 133 120 214749478957 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.9% Average	Read 96.4 Write 77.8 Mixed 93.4 67% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.2 57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 50%
Kingston DT microDuo 32GB 773 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 19GB free, PID 16a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Read 24.4 Write 10.4 Mixed 13.7 18% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.37 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
FE02FE02 EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 1x2GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G5320gr Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: HP G5320gr

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	1x

GPU
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	1x

SSD
P210 256GBPatriotBench 65%, 5,446 samples	1x

RAM
9905458-009.A00LF 9B852C80 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 9801 9905458-009.A00LF 9B852C80 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 12GBUnknownBench 16%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $471

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16